Let's recap: FACTS:
1) Analysis said it was about AmericanPatriot 2) Analysis is a "record" for being far away from you 3) Analysis said it was worthless and for "laughs" 4) When I asked you if you thought it was ethical to post private emails, I got no straight response Your conclusion: The onus is on me to prove that the analysis is not about you and I should post private emails. My conclusion: The logic seems weak to me, as does the data. Didn't you call such things fantasizing? Since you seem so concerned, I was considering quoting the emails from memory (I don't have them saved to copy them verbatim), but without hearing your opinion on whether that would be ethical, I won't be doing it. That's why I asked your opinion on the subject, but I got no straight answer. -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/
