At 03:08 AM 7/13/02, Jeroen wrote:
>At 17:19 12-07-2002 -0500, Ronn Blankenship wrote:
>
>>>I think that everyone is either sick of it
>>
>>Got it in one.
>
>Then do something about it. Tell Erik that if he makes such claims, he
>should back them up with proof and answer questions. Get him to actually
>provide proof and answers.
>
>Unless, of course, Erik's behaviour is considered acceptable behaviour
>these days. Is it?
>
>That was NOT a rhetorical question, BTW.
>
>(If it *is* considered acceptable behaviour, we throw the door wide open
>for ranters, flamers, and other scum. If it *not* acceptable -- well, then
>why is everyone but me letting him get away with it?)
Because all of us realize that it takes *two* parties to argue?
IOW, if one party does not respond to the attempts of the second to
start/continue an argument, the second will eventually get tired of the
attempt.
--Ronn! :)
"Since I was a small boy, two states have been added to our country and two
words have been added to the pledge of Allegiance... UNDER GOD. Wouldn't
it be a pity if someone said that is a prayer and that would be eliminated
from schools too?"
-- Red Skelton
