On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 09:55:26PM -0400, Jim Sharkey wrote: > A) I never said that I thought they were mutually exclusive. However, > your give and take with Nick gave the impression *you* felt that way, > whether you meant to give that impression or not.
Nick and I have a difference of opinion, as I said. But we can still tolerate each other in discussions, or ignore each other. I probably wouldn't even reply to many of his criticisms, except that the list has a fairly recent history of NOT tolerating some posters and trying to forcibly ban them. So I debate the point. > D) This discussion has nothing to do with you specifically. But it is certainly highly related, considering that the first words in your post were "Erik Reuter" and you quoted a paragraph I wrote. > But not everything is about you, believe it or not. I believe it. But not everything is an attack on you, believe it or not. Maybe, just maybe, I was interested in discussing your idea and proposing an alternate way of viewing the situation than what your post presented. > Since you two seem to be at opposite ends of the spectrum, it seemed a > good place to start. I thought so. That's why I replied. > If it bores you, ignore it. What ever gave you the idea that it bored me? -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/
