Erik Reuter wrote:
>
> Nick, you have it completely backwards. The ONLY logical
> option is to disagree with a premise, you can NOT disagree
> with logic. If A implies B, and B implies C, then you
> can disagree with the assumption A, but not with the logic
> that A implies C (you might say that the logic has a
> mistake, but then it isn't really logic but rather
> illogic).
>
Why not? Have you ever heard about fuzzy logic? I want
to believe in A, I want to believe that A implies B,
that B implies C, but I do not want to believe in C.
Do you want to force upon me that "if I believe in A,
and if I believe that A implies B, and if I believe that
B implies C, then I must believe in C"?
> There's that faulty memory again. Just look back to the
> thread where a number of people advocated banning Mark;
> before that, there was talk about kicking off JDG;
> before that, Alberto.
>
Actually, my punishment was "administrative", for posting
an attachment, not for anything I said.
Alberto Monteiro
