Erik Reuter wrote: > >Also, you didn't argue against my third example. Even if we leave out >the other two, my third example is sufficient evidence. > However, you stated before:
> If A implies B, and B implies C, then you > can disagree with the assumption A, but not with the logic > that A implies C And I replied: > Why not? Have you ever heard about fuzzy logic? I want > to believe in A, I want to believe that A implies B, > that B implies C, but I do not want to believe in C. > > Do you want to force upon me that "if I believe in A, > and if I believe that A implies B, and if I believe that > B implies C, then I must believe in C"? Why are you wasting your time, posting here? You should be working on a message in which you back you claim with a mathematically self-consistent logical proof and answer my question. I STILL WANT THE LOGIC BEHIND YOU CLAIM, AND I STILL WANT AN ANSWER. Alberto Monteiro
