J. van Baardwijk wrote: > It should be the lurkers who demand that I get removed as a listowner, > not the one-woman action of a listowner.
Considering Cornell have been hosting this list for all these years, and much of that because of Eileen, and considering that lurkers may well complain to Cornell rather than you, putting Eileen on the spot, I am really disappointed that you could say that. I'd like to thank Eileen for taking on the responsibility with Cornell over the last few years, not chastise her for taking prompt action against illegal abuse of power. Russell C. (It wasn't just lurkers who were published - plenty of active community members have a public address that they post from, and private ones they receive to, that are no longer private).
