> If you want to keep up at least an appearance of fairness, that last
> sentence should read: "..., and I'm removing Jeroen as a a listowner
> tomorrow (if list consensus can be reached).".
>
> So far I have seen only four or five messages from people who support your
> action; that hardly qualifies as "list consensus".
>
> To quote David Hobby (00:23 17-07-2002 -0400):
>
> >It's really not fair to assume that everyone who is too sick of it all
> >to post is on your side.
>
> Jeroen "Brin-L Scapegoat And Doormat" van Baardwijk
Jeroen-- But it goes for you too! Has anyone come forward
yet saying you should not be removed? For the record, I agree that
you should step down as listowner. This is because I believe that
listowners should be held to a high standard of civility. I am a
little shaky about the argument based on your posting of the
subscriber list. It does seem a bit picky to me. I subscribe to
other lists where the subscriber list is public, and I do not
recall any representation that our subscriber list would be secret.
Anyway, the list looks full of errors! I seem to be subscribed
under "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", for instance. That may safely
be deleted.
---David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
