On Fri, 19 Jul 2002 22:19:31 +0200, J. van Baardwijk wrote:

>>OK, maybe I should not count the third one; that message came from a
>>lurker who cowardly refused to give his/her name (it is neither in his
>>e-mail address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) nor in the message itself).
>
>Unfortunately for this lurker, I have zero tolerance and the same amount of
>sympathy for people who attack while hiding in anonimity. Also
>unfortunately for him, he underestimated me and thought he could remain
>anonymous. I copied some data from the headers of his post and did a
>search
>on it in my archive. The first two attempts (e-mail address and IP address)
>returned nothing, but the third attempt did.
>
>It turned out to be someone from Brin-L's past, someone we have not
>heard
>from since February 2000 (except for an unsubscribe command last
>January
>that got sent to the list instead of to the listserver).
>
>Ladies and gentlemen, the lost sheep known as Dean MacLanders has
>returned
>to the flock. Blating like crazy off-list.

To Jeroen:
How dramatic. And my aren't you clever. While I don't take great measures to 
protect my identity on the internet, I also don't make an effort to broadcast 
it.  If this disturbs you, perhaps you could have tried asking me before 
concocting scenarios of conspiracy and attacks. You are constantly seeking 
consensus on these matters. I added my 2 cents. All that should have 
mattered was that I was a listmember. This you verified.

To Brin-L:
I emailed Jeroen wanting to criticise his disruptive behaviour and encourage 
him to examine his own actions and seek help if needed.  I was wrong to 
attempt this but I had just finished catching up on a weeks worth of mail which 
was still saturated with this crap. Although I was not part of any conspiracy 
it may have appeared to Jeroen as if I was. I apologise to the list for 
throwing fuel on the fire. My intentions in keeping it off list was to avoid 
further embarrassment for Jeroen and reduce list volume of a tired subject.

Jeroen, you should check your records. I think you are attributing that 
"unsubscribe" post in January to the wrong person. However, please don't 
post a correction as the poster likely values their privacy also.

Thank you. This is all the blating I intend to do on this matter.
Hi All! , re-lurking

[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/23/2002

Reply via email to