Nick Arnett wrote: > > If the consensus is to get rid of "[Brin-L]" in the subject > > line, it'll go. And as a practical matter, that means if no > > one strongly objects in the next 24 hours or so to getting > > rid of it. Anyone?
Ray Ludenia wrote: > I see you managed to send this message without it! Actually, since "[Brin-L]" was already somewhere in the subject, it didn't add an additional one to the beginning -- which is one of the reasons the tag makes the "Re:" thingies look weird. > I agree we should junk it for the reasons others have noted. I also agree. I have used the "To" field to filter the list for several years. The [Brin-L] tag isn't needed for general list threads, and it makes it harder to see the other [] tags. ______________________________________________________________________ Steve Sloan ......... Huntsville, Alabama =========> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brin-L list pages ....................... http://www.sloan3d.com/brinl Chmeee's 3D Objects .................... http://www.sloan3d.com/chmeee 3D and Drawing Galleries .................. http://www.sloansteady.com Software ................ Science Fiction, Science, and Computer Links Science fiction scans ......................... http://www.sloan3d.com _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
