> From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 09:20:43PM -0500, The Fool wrote: > > > You ignore the duplicate headers. Is it 100% no. It it a quicky that > > I would never actually do? Yes. > > You're joking, right? You CANNOT KNOW THAT THEY ARE DUPLICATES. They > look like the start of a new message.
Only in the case where the first message has no body, ie no message header like statements, in which case the second message would show up as the body of the first message. I just said it wasn't 100% and a kludge. You can't tell what the first message header will be, nor the last. Which is why you always design things that specify size, always. In any case, this kludge would produce something that would show both messages, whether they ended up nested or not. > > Also you would assume that when you started getting duplicate headers > > that it would be a possible message start. > > How can you ignore AND assume it is a message start? Have you been > drinking? Message BODY start. Status: U Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
