>From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: how religious fanatics attack free speech >Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 21:43:13 -0500 > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "William T Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "BRIN-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 9:13 PM >Subject: Re: how religious fanatics attack free speech > > > > on 25/9/02 2:00 am, Dan Minette at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 7:46 PM > > > Subject: Re: how religious fanatics attack free speech > > > > 1) religious does not equal non-atheist > > 2) atheist does not equal non-religious > > 3) religious does not equal theist (or deist or pantheist even) > >Established means general agreement; I saw two people buy into this >definition. That is not equal to establish. I think that it is definition >of convenience for you, allowing you to put movements you don't like into >the other camp. > > >Dan M.
I do tend to agree, here. Those who follow the doctrine of Jefferson too closely aren't religous, just lawyers... One puts groups that don't follow YOUR doctrines or follow your doctrines in a different way under the heading of religon, which seperates them from one's self -Russell _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
