--- Jean-Louis Couturier wrote:
> Erik Reuter [wrote:]
> 
> > I would suggest at
> > least 3 codes meaning roughly: "well-though-of",
> "somewhat annoying",
> > "real asshole". Dings could be any real number
> that people decide (but I
> > still think absolute minimum of 1 ding cost to
> ding someone else), and
> > your script could translate ding-threshold-levels
> into one of the 3 code levels.
> 
> I'd have separate scores for dings received an dings
> given.  If Erik's 
> codes are applied to dings received, we could have a
> code for dingers 
> along the lines of "Tolerant", "Capricious" and
> "Opinion Police"

And
 [Erik Reuter wrote:]
>> Maybe we could also have things that decrease your
>ding number. Not
>> dongs (I give you the dong! :-) ummm, tips or nods?
>Or you could call
>> them kisses (or carresses, or ...) and then the
>codes for people who use
>> them would mean "friendly", "promiscuous", >and
"real whore".

> Ooh!  This is good!  And kissees could be "Geek with
> glasses", "Independant" and "Prom Queen".

Practical, informative _and_ fun.  However, I'd change
the names for second and third degree 'kisser' to
something like "generous" and "ludicrously
extravagant" - symbols could be :) :D and ;D.

So the 'kissees' could be 8^) ;) and @:D  (that's
supposed to be a tiara!)

The 'ding' status could be :o) :/  and 8o (or 8. )

Then 'dingers' would be  :-) ;/ and >:(

Or something like that.

Social Moth Maru

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to