The writer said President Bush is lying about two things, Iraq's unmanned drones and nuclear capabilities.The author is cutting a fine line between what was said and what he considers a lie. Is he denying that there are unmanned drones? Did the president say that the unmanned drones could fly from Iraq all the way to Norman, Oklahoma? To me, targeting the United states means striking embassies, military bases, or US tourist heavy locations. Heck wouldn't attacking Israel be the same as targeting the US? Not literally but near enough.

The nuclear statement can be as easily muddled. This is a bad defense but wasn't Iraq six months away at one time, before 1991?

In the context of Clinton, his sex lies didn't exist in a vacuum. He was in a court of law giving sworn testimony and he lied. How can that be defended?

Kevin T.

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to