The Fool wrote: > >> It's idiotic just because you begin with the >> axiom that "if God existed, he would act the way >> I would act, if I were omni*.*". > > No he [the god of the bible] would act the way he > portrayed as acting. But that contradicts what is > written in said book. > You added another axiom: "God must act the way he alllows men to understand how he acts".
> >It is mathematically impossible to proove / disproove that a God exists. > According to Heinlein, it's mathematically possible to prove _anything_. An exageration, but in this case it's valid. >It is possible to proove that this particular one described by the bible >does not exist. > Just by adding extra-bible axioms :-) See? I am the skeptic, you are the believer. You have faith that it's possible to prove the non-existence of the bible god :-P Alberto Monteiro _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
