http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=68&ncid=68&e=9&u=/nyt/200
30117/ts_nyt/states_can_limit_emergency_access_in_medicaid_cases

States Can Limit Emergency Access in Medicaid Cases
Fri Jan 17, 9:01 AM ET  Add to My Yahoo! 
 

By ROBERT PEAR The New York Times 

WASHINGTON, Jan. 16 In a reversal, the Bush administration has ruled that
managed care organizations can limit and restrict coverage of emergency
services for poor people on Medicaid. 

The new policy, disclosed in a recent letter to state Medicaid directors,
appears to roll back standards established in a 1997 law and in rules
issued by the Clinton administration in January 2001 and by the Bush
administration itself in June 2002. 


Under the 1997 law, states can require Medicaid recipients to enroll in
health maintenance organizations or other types of managed care. But
certain safeguards for patients were built into that law. Congress, for
example, stipulated that managed care organizations had to provide
coverage for Medicaid patients in any situation that a "prudent
layperson" would regard as an emergency. 


Now the Bush administration has decided that states can place certain
limits on coverage of emergency services "to facilitate more appropriate
use of preventive care and primary care," the letter said. 


Administration officials said today that the new policy was consistent
with President Bush ( - )'s desire to give states greater flexibility in
the operation of their Medicaid programs. 


"Some states felt restricted and constricted by the old policy," said
Gregory A. Vadner, the Missouri Medicaid director, who is also vice
chairman of the National Association of State Medicaid Directors. "In a
time of fiscal stress for states, it's all the more important that we
have discretion to manage programs properly." 


States say they are facing the worst fiscal crisis in more than 50 years
and are desperately looking for ways to control health costs. Many have
cut benefits or restricted eligibility in an effort to hold down Medicaid
costs, which rose 13 percent in the last fiscal year, the biggest
increase in a decade. 


But Cindy Mann, a Medicaid expert at Georgetown University, questioned
the legality of the new policy. 


Senator Bob Graham, Democrat of Florida, a principal author of the 1997
law, said the new policy "would undermine access to essential emergency
services for low-income Americans," including children, the elderly and
the disabled. 


Mr. Graham said he did not understand how the administration could, by a
letter, make such profound changes in a policy established by statute. 


Administration officials said the basic Medicaid law allowed states to
set reasonable limits on the amount, duration and scope of services. 


The letter was sent to state officials by Dennis G. Smith, the Bush
administration official in charge of Medicaid. Under the old policy, Mr.
Smith said, states could not limit coverage of emergency services for
Medicaid beneficiaries in managed care. "When the prudent layperson
standard is met," the old policy said, "no restriction may be placed on
access to emergency care. Limits on the number of visits are not
allowed." 


More than 40 million people are insured through Medicaid. More than 55
percent of them are in some type of managed care. 


The letter does not specifically say what kind of limits can be imposed,
but state officials have discussed ideas like limits on the number of
emergency room visits that would be covered. 


Ben A. Bearden, the Medicaid director in Louisiana, said his state wanted
to limit Medicaid coverage for adults to three emergency room visits a
year. 


"Three emergency visits a year for an adult may sound like a small
number, but it's really not," Mr. Bearden said today in an interview.
"I'm 60 years old, and I've been to an emergency room once in my life.
The E.R. is very expensive, and people in this state use it
inappropriately. They go in for a stubbed toe." 


Louisiana used to have a three-visit limit, Mr. Bearden said, but, at the
insistence of federal Medicaid officials, the state ended the restriction
for people in managed care a couple of years ago. 


Under one form of managed care, states pay primary care doctors to
coordinate care for Medicaid recipients. 

Mark D. Trail, the Medicaid director in Georgia, said that prior to 1997,
his state required an emergency room to get authorization from the
primary care doctor before treating a Medicaid patient enrolled in the
state's managed care plan. 

Georgia did away with that requirement because of the 1997 law. "Since
then," Mr. Trail said, "use of hospital emergency rooms has spiked," and
the state is seeking ways to reduce inappropriate use. 

Mr. Vadner, the Missouri official, said states recognized their
obligation to cover emergency care. But there is often a dispute over who
should pay and what services are needed. 

Michelle Mickey, a policy analyst at the National Association of State
Medicaid Directors, said state officials had sought a clarification of
federal policy on emergency care. The new policy, she said, is "above and
beyond what the states ever requested or expected." 

Senator Graham introduced a bill to establish the "prudent layperson"
standard for all insurers in 1997. The standard was included in the
Balanced Budget Act of 1997, as a requirement for managed care plans
serving people in Medicaid or Medicare. The purpose, Mr. Graham said, is
"to allow a person who reasonably believes that he or she is undergoing
an emergency condition to be evaluated, treated and stabilized in the
emergency room without fear that the health plan will later deny the
claim." 

A prudent layperson is defined in the law as a person with "an average
knowledge of health and medicine." 

Doctors and hospitals said the prudent layperson standard was needed
because H.M.O.'s had often refused to pay for emergency care after
concluding that there was no real emergency if, for example, chest pains
resulted from severe indigestion rather than a heart attack. 

Under the law, the managed care plan is supposed to pay for the emergency
care, regardless of whether the patient got "prior authorization." The
patient can go to the nearest hospital, regardless of whether it is in
the health plan's network of providers. 

The Bush administration issued rules interpreting the law on June 14,
2002. In a news release at the time, the administration said, "Health
plans must pay for a Medicaid beneficiary's emergency room care whenever
and wherever the need arises."

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to