Damon wrote:
> I think what would be even more illuminating about this > attack is the
> nature of the gas. Its quite possible that it may have been a *new*
> non-lethal suppressive gas that had unforseen serious
> side-effects. Has
> this gas been used since? Has any report been done on the use
> of this gas?
> What kind of gas was it, exactly?

John Horn replied:
Kind of like the gas used in Russia against the Chechyen rebels in the
theater, I guess.

I'm *still* not sure how they got away with that one...


Reggie Bautista


_________________________________________________________________



_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to