On 31 Mar 2003 at 12:41, The Fool wrote:

> > From: Alberto Monteiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> > While discussing the Foundation and Robots Trilogy in
> > one Asimov list, I suddenly saw myself justifying why
> > it's ok to change Daneel from the God's Tool to the
> > Galactic Evil Overlord. And then I had to think - and criticize -
> > the Three Laws. And suddenly I realized this [that I sent to that
> > list]:
> > 
> >   IMHO, the Three Laws are the most Evil thing Humanity has ever
> >   perpretrated in all the sf books I've ever read or movies I've
> watched.
> >   It's more evil than 1984's Big Brother, or the way anthropoids are
> >   treated in Planet of the Apes.
> > 
> >   It's absolutely Evil to create an intelligent slave race who is
> uncapable 
> >   of even dreaming of becoming non-slave.
> 
> Perhaps, but then the laws are actually designed for a different
> specific purpose, that is to prevent the robots from doing things like
> killing all humans, or becoming bloody dictators.  The laws are to
> protect humans, not to harm robots.

Oh come on, I don't have to explain the differences between intent 
and effects to anyone here do I?

Andy
Dawn Falcon

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to