On 31 Mar 2003 at 9:57, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:

> At 06:27 AM 3/31/03 +0100, Andrew Crystall wrote:
> 
> >I refer you to the, for example, the fact that VPN's and NAT are
> >ALLREADY illegal in several US states.
> 
> 
> 
> "VPN's?"  "NAT?"
> 
> Too bad that the use of unexplained acronyms isn't similarly
> prohibited . . .

Virtual Private Network. It's used for say working from home - ypu make a
VPN to the work computers. It's highly secure.

Network Address Translation. Needed because there arn't enough IPv4
addresses for everyone and everything. All dial-up and some DSL ISP's (who
give dynamic IP's) use NAT, or you might with a router to connect multiple
computers to a broadband connection.

Both fall in the home under "obscuring the origion or destination of
communications from the transit provider (ISP)"

Andy
Dawn Falcon


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to