----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Street" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 9:05 PM
Subject: RE: Question for those who are anti-war . . .


> Robert Seeberger wrote:
> > Soviet Russia used to do things like this, and you never saw this level
of
> > protest over it.
> > China is still in Tibet and the protest is minimal in comparison.
> >
> > A lot is made by the rest of the world of Americas inconsistencies in
> > foreign policy. But the rest of the world has been pretty inconsistent
in
> the pursuit of
> > peace.
>
> Yes, Russia and China have done terrible things, in both this century and
> the last one. If it was possible, they should be brought to account for
> their crimes. But at the moment, they're just too powerful. A war to
> liberate Chechyna or Tibet would kill too many people to be worth the
cost.
> The world is inconsistent about preventing aggression, and it shouldn't
be.
> But at the moment, it's the only world we've got.
>
> The thing that bothers me so much here is that this time it's *America*
> who's the aggressor. The one major power that has (almost) never acted in
an
> imperialistic manner, the country that has helped other nations far more
> than it has harmed them. A country that has, up until now, been an
> inspiration and model for the world.
>
> Yes, we expect more of the United States than other countries. And the
> United States should expect more of itself.
>

It is very kind of you to state things so diplomatically. And I for one
appreciate such efforts. Thank you!

I serious problem that I see is the propensity for the peace movement to
live in the moment with little serious consideration for the future.
Where were these supposed peace protestors when France, Russia, China, and
NK were not just arming third world nations, but helping them build a WMD
infrastructure?
The peace movement tends to be blind to the past, unless it is looking for
recriminating evidence, and is absolutely blind to the future.

Where the peace movement should focus a large share of its attention is upon
the weapons manufacturers in their own nations and in creating weapons
embargoes on countries like NK.

How about a push for a moratorium on the export of artillery and tanks and
the like? Ammunition? Land mines?

This stuff isn't manufactured onsite, these are export items.
A lot could be done to insure a future peace by pushing the UN and working
within our own countries.
The US is not so much the worlds Sheriff as it is the worlds Janitor.


xponent
Atomic Janitor Maru
rob
Workings of man
Set to ply out historical life
Reregaining the flower of the fruit of his tree
All awakening
All restoring you
Workings of man
Crying out from the fire set aflame
By his blindness to see that the warmth of his being
Is promised for his seeing his reaching so clearly
Workings of man
Driven far from the path
Rereleased in inhibitions
So that all is left for you
all is left for you
all is left for you
all this left for you NOW...



_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to