--- "Miller, Jeffrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Jan Coffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > --- "Miller, Jeffrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > >'We are being very careful now not to jump to any
> conclusions about these vehicles'<
> > 
> > why can't we just take them at their word. They
> keep saying, 
> > we don't yet know. Well, let's stop the flaming
> until they do 
> > know. No-one ever said that we would end the war,
> go in, find anthrax stockpiled.
> 
> Actually, people did.
> 
> > In fact it was said all along that WMD's  were the
> most extreme reason, not the only reason.
> 
> That's what people are saying /now/ ..and WMD were
> what was used as the reason to short-circuit the UN
> inspectors, NOT the horridness of Saddam's regime
<snip> 

The attempt to backpedal from
WMD-as-the-reason-for-war is perplexing, as certainly
*I* understood that to be the primary stated reason
for going to war; in fact it was strongly implied that
the US was *under direct threat* from Saddam's Iraq
(see quote ^^'d below).  Not that direct evidence was
given, which IIRC was my major complaint about this
action (I'm still reserving public comment on the
setting-up of post-war Iraq, although so far it has
not been a blue-ribbon performance -- they could yet
pull ahead in the backstretch, if I may mix my
metaphors).

http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/06/06/findlaw.analysis.dean.wmd/#dean
>From President Bush's radio address, October 5, 2002: 

"The Iraqi regime . . . possesses and produces
chemical and biological weapons. It is seeking nuclear
weapons." 

"We know that the regime has produced thousands of
tons of chemical agents, including mustard gas, sarin
nerve gas, VX nerve gas." 

"We've also discovered through intelligence that Iraq
has a growing fleet of manned and unmanned aerial
vehicles that could be used to disperse chemical or
biological weapons across broad areas. We're concerned
that Iraq is exploring ways of using these UAVS for
missions targeting the United States." 
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The article is certainly slanted against the Admin's
position, but many of the points/questions are valid.

Debbi


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to