Reggie Bautista wrote: >How would you say it(Vitals) compares to _Heads_, if you've read that one? (I >thought _Heads_ had some very interesting ideas, but was overall pretty >disappointed.)
It has been awhile since I read Heads. I would say Vitals is better. But I have liked everything I have read by Bear. (to varying degrees.) The only exception to that is the short stories, which I have not cared for, and I have not read Rogue Planet. I think G.D.Akin said something like 'get it at the library or used book store'. I would second that. It is not 'Hardbound' worthy. Jim _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
