--- The Fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/B?r108:@FIELD(FLD003+s)[EMAIL 
PROTECTED](DDATE+20030730)

<massive snippage> 
> The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Illinois. 
> 
>    Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, to those of us who
> have been given this
> great honor to serve in the Senate, there is a
> moment when we are asked
> to take the oath of office. In taking that oath of
> office, we swear to
> uphold one document. That document, of course, is
> the Constitution of the United States of America. 
> 
>    We are not asked our religion, nor our beliefs in
> our religion. We are
> only asked if we will take an oath to God that we
> will uphold this
> Constitution. All of us take it very seriously and
> all of us take the
> wording of this Constitution very seriously because
> within this small
> document are words that have endured for more than
> two centuries... 
<snip> 
> ...Those are very absolute and clear words. I am a
> Catholic, born and
> raised. My mother and father were Catholics. My
> children have been raised in the Catholic faith... 
<snip> 
>    John Kennedy, a Catholic, went to Texas to a
> Baptist convention to
> tell those gathered that his first allegiance as
> President was to the
> United States and not to any religion. He said: I
> believe in America
>where the separation of church and State is absolute.

<snip> 
>    But for us to be told repeatedly by the other
> side of the aisle that
> to oppose William Pryor is to be against him because
> he is Catholic is
> just plain wrong, and I resent it. I resent it
> because, frankly, there
> are many reasons to oppose his nomination--because
> of his political beliefs. 
<snip> 
>    At his confirmation hearing, Senator Feinstein
> asked him to explain his statement that: 
> 
>    ..... the challenge of the next millennium will
> be to preserve the
> American experiment by restoring its Christian
> perspective.
> 
>    He ducked the question. 
> 
>    I think if you are going to serve this Nation and
> you are going to
> serve this Constitution, you have to have some
> sensitivity to the
> diversity of religious belief in this country. To
> argue that this is a
> Christian nation--it may have been in its origin but
> today it is a nation
> of great diversity. That diversity is protected by
> this Constitution.
> Obviously, Mr. Pryor has some problems in grasping
> that concept. 
<snip> 
>    There was one case involving inmates' rights
> which I thought was
> particularly noteworthy. He has been a vocal
> opponent of the right of
> criminal defendants. In Hope v. Pelzer, Attorney
> General Pryor vigorously
> defended Alabama's practice of handcuffing prison
> inmates to outdoor
> hitching posts for hours without water or access to
> bathrooms. The
> Supreme Court rejected Mr. Pryor's arguments citing
> the ``obvious cruelty
> inherent in the practice,'' and calling the practice
> ``antithetical to
> human dignity'' and circumstances ``both degrading
> and dangerous.'' 
<snip> 
>    I hope and pray that before we utter the next
> sentence in relation to
> the Pryor nomination that each of us who has taken
> an oath to uphold this
> Constitution will stop and read article VI: 
> 
>    No religious test shall ever be required as a
> qualification to any
> office or public trust in the United States. 
> 
>    Those words have guided our Nation for over 200
> years. They should guide each of us in good
>conscience. 


There's one man who understands how important the
separation of church and state are to this country's
success - and survival.

Debbi

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to