I thought the Doc would be interested; the Strict
Fatherites certainly fall into the Authoritarians of
the 'triple-axis political spectrum' (IIRC), but I'm
not sure the Nurturant Parents correspond precisely
with the Progressives/Liberals (?).  I snipped a lot,
and cut&pasted once*.

--- "Robert J. Chassell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On his Web site, 
> http://www.therightchristians.org/BlogWeek10.htm
> 
> Allen Brill [*(Brill is a Lutheran minister; his
slogan is "It is time for the Christian Right to meet
the right Christians." hence, the name of his Web
site.)] has written a piece in which he starts
> out by saying
> 
>     Nothing could be more obvious than that American
> progressives need
>     a clearer view of the "big picture" of our
> political landscape.
>     We're accused by the Right of wishing for Bush's
> foreign and
>     domestic policies to fail because that's our
> only hope for
>     victory, and when we look at much of what
> progressives have to
>     say, it must be admitted that the focus is on
> what's wrong with
>     Bush rather than what's right about Democrats.

-As several on the List have pointed out also-
 
> Brill quotes a writer who points out
> 
>     ... there can be no effective media without a
> coherent message
> 
> Brill then goes on to develop a `Theory of
> Everything' regarding US
> political rhetoric.  He makes use of the ideas that
> George Lakoff
> talks about in his book on the political
> implications of cognitive linguistics, "Moral
>Politics".
> 
> Brill says:
> 
>     Political scientists have long tried to describe
> the electorate in
>     terms of ideology.  In its most simplified form:
> conservatives want
>     a government as small and de-centralized as
> possible that
>     interferes as little as possible in people's
> lives; liberals want
>     a large, centralized government that is very
> involved in people's
>     lives. That might have been a fairly helpful
> description of the electorate during the New
Deal....
<snip> 
> 
>     Lakoff's research has led him to conclude that
> most of us use a
>     metaphor of our nation as a family. The
> government at the federal,
>     state and local level is thought of as the
> "parent" and the
>     citizens stand in the role of "children." 
<snip> 
> 
>     "Strict Fatherites" see the world as a dangerous
> place filled with
>     evil, and believe that survival is dependent on
> self-discipline
>     and moral strength.  Their "common sense" tells
> them that
>     self-discipline is only created by strict
> enforcement of a system
>     of rewards and punishments that teach everyone,
> especially
>     children, that they must work hard, obey
> authority and keep
>     morally pure if they are to succeed. ....  The
> government's job
>     instead is to punish those who do not conform to
> the moral
>     standards of the majority because otherwise, the
> impurity of their
>     behavior will spread like a disease throughout
> the society.
> 
>     "Nurturant Parents" see the world very
> differently.  Their picture
>     of the family places empathy, communication and
> respect above
>     discipline, strength and purity.  At the heart
> of the moral system
>     is what Lakoff calls a "strong" Golden Rule:
> 
>         Do unto others as _they_ would have you do
> unto them.
> 
>     With so much depending on it, however, there are
> a few additional
>     considerations. I would suggest that Lakoff's
> model misses one
>     very important and growing worldview in the
> electorate.  This
>     conceptual metaphor does NOT see the nation as a
> family.  I will
>     call it the "Every man (and woman) is an island"
> worldview. The
>     central metaphor is this worldview is that of
> personal boundaries and space.  Simply stated:
> 
>         No one is entited to intrude into my space
> if I do not intrude
>         into theirs. Those who intrude into the
> space of others are
>         morally bad and should be punished.
> 
>     For them, the nation is not a family but not
> much more than the sea in which their island sits.
> 
>     Many of those who operate by this metaphor call
> themselves libertarians....

I snipped the rest of Bob's post; I'm still reading
the site & links.

Debbi 

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to