The Fool forwarded: > <<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/10 > /15/wbish15. > xml&sSheet=/news/2003/10/15/ixnewstop.html>> > > Terrorists can have serious moral goals, says Williams > By Jonathan Petre, Religion Correspondent > (Filed: 15/10/2003) > > > The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, yesterday > urged America > to recognise that terrorists can "have serious moral goals". > > He said that while terrorism must always be condemned, it was wrong to > assume its perpetrators were devoid of political rationality. "It is > possible to use unspeakably wicked means to pursue an aim > that is shared > by those who would not dream of acting in the same way, an aim that is > intelligible or desirable."
So where, when and how does he defend terrorism? I have read the entire report and haven't come across a single statement that would count as defence of the terrorists? Ritu _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
