Subject: [UL] Microsoft launches self-destructing email (false)

> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/33507.html
>
> The Register | 22 Oct 2003
>
> Microsoft launches self-destructing email (false)
>
> By John Leyden
>
>    An urban myth has grown up around today's launch of Microsoft Office
>    2003 which suggests that the product features technology that allows
>    embarrassing emails to self destruct after a specified time period.
>
>    If you believe early reports, the inclusion of an Information
>    Rights Management technology within Microsoft Office 2003 means that
>    embarrassing documents will vanish into the ether after a determined
>    period.
>
>    We're told the package includes safeguards such as a "self destruct"
>    mechanism, putting a time limit on the lifespan of documents, as well
>    as the ability to limit which recipients can open, edit, copy or even
>    print a document.
>
>    So no more embarrassing revelations spreading across company email
>    systems like wildfire (Claire Swires) or legally dubious memos
>    (Merrill Lynch technology analyst Henry Blodget describing stock he
>    promoted in email as junk) to worry about?
>
>    Unfortunately not.
>
>    Microsoft's Information Rights Management technology *does* include
>    controls that enable the author of information to control its use.
>
>    However users looking for Mission Impossible-style auto-destruct
>    technology are likely to be disappointed.
>
>    "There is no technology or functionality within Office 2003 to make
>    emails or documents disappear," a Microsoft spokeswoman told The
>    Register.
>
>    "After a time limit an email doesn't vanish -- it expires. Someone with
>    administrative rights can still retrieve it from a server," she added.
>
>    Jamie Cowper, consultant at Mirapoint, a messaging firm, adds:
>    "Although some of the features may make it more difficult for sensitive
>    information to be 'forwarded' into the wrong hands, the fact remains
>    that it will still be stored centrally due to archiving laws, making
>    companies liable if the content is incriminating. People have an
>    uncanny knack of overcoming technical limitations if the information
>    is valuable enough."
>

xponent
Disinformation Maru
rob


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to