<<http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2003/10/28/abstinence/index_np.html>>

No sex, please -- or we'll audit you
Why are some nonprofit organizations that don't agree with the Bush
administration's "abstinence only" philosophy repeatedly investigated by
the government, while faith-based groups get a free pass?

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Christopher Healy



Oct. 28, 2003  |  Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Laden, condoms: George W.
Bush has a lot of enemies. And the question is finally starting to be
asked, just what steps is his administration willing to take in order to
silence them? Network anchormen and coffee-break pundits alike were abuzz
over the did-they-or-didn't-they CIA leak scandal. But the outing of
Valerie Plame isn't the only instance where the federal government has
been suspected of using its resources in direct, if somewhat sneaky,
retaliation against its political opponents. Ruining the lives of CIA
agents may make for dynamic headlines, but recent evidence shows that the
Bush administration also has much smaller fish to fry. 

Take Advocates for Youth, a national nonprofit organization that provides
teens with accurate and informative sex education. In 18 years as a
federal grantee, it has never been subjected to a government financial
audit. That is, until it was suddenly hit with three in less than a year
(one by the Centers for Disease Control back in October 2002, a second by
the General Accounting Office in early 2003, and the third just two
months ago, by a different arm of the CDC). The organization is crying
conspiracy -- saying that it's being unfairly targeted because of its
negative views toward the administration's abstinence-only education
policies -- and the claims appear to be more than just paranoia. 
....

----
"Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the
mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise, every
expanded project." - James Madison

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to