On 31 Oct 2003 at 12:11, William T Goodall wrote: > > On 31 Oct 2003, at 07:19, Ronn!Blankenship wrote: > > > At 10:21 PM 10/30/03 -0600, The Fool wrote: > >> > From: Reggie Bautista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > >> > I wrote: > >> > >>The only group you are likely to get consistent answers from > >> would be > >> > >>the anti-religious groups, as you can probably see from some of > >> > >> > >> the > >> > >>others who have already answered your email. > >> > > >> > William T. Goodall replied: > >> > >Doesn't this indicate where the compelling evidence leads? > >> > > >> > That the only group that follows in lockstep and allows no > >> > dissent > >> from > >> > their orthodoxy is the anti-religious group? > >> > >> Interesting. You are attempting to frame freethinkers and > >> rationalists > >> as authoritarian thought police. But the fact remains that > >> freethinkers > >> and rationalists have thrown off shackles of religious thought > >> control, not the other way around. > > > > > > > > Though it is interesting how many of the people who describe > > themselves as "free thinkers" seem to think alike on so many issues, > > and to reject the positions of anyone who disagrees with them on > > those issues (abortion, frex) . . . > > > > Maybe because although there an infinite number of ways of being > wrong, there is usually only one way of being right?
And WHAT is why what you preach is a religion. A high doctrinal, strident, intollerant religion. What, you thought a god was a requirement of a religion? http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=religion 4. "A cause, principle, or activity pursued with zeal or conscientious devotion." Andy Dawn Falcon _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
