Trent Shipley wrote:
>
>> I have done some estimates on this. From data from GURPS Uplift and
>> from Contacting Aliens, I estimate:
>>
>> * about 2 million populated planets at each time
>
> Across how many galaxies?
>
All five of them.

> (Note that for the 1000KY +- Contact Galaxy 4 was
> fallow, so it doesn't matter.  The real question is whether the GIM
> populates 2M planets in Galaxy 2 or throughout GIM controled space.)
>
My estimate includes all five. Of course, as in Drake's equation,
each factor has an error from 10% to 900% :-)

>> * about 10 planets per race
>> * about 200,000 races
>
> I'll take this on faith, with the qualification that 200K O-2 races is
> somwhat inconvenient for writers.
>
Yep :-)

>> Most of those species would be doing "nothing", except about
>> * 10% being uplifted
>> * 10% in the 100,000-year period of indenture
>> * 10% uplifting a pre-sentient race
>> * 10% being served by an indentured client
> 
> Your model seems to be
> pre-uplift (stage 0)
> -> uplifting client (stages 1 to 4?)
> -> indentured client (stage 5?)
> Since stage has the same population, and assuming mortality is minimal,
> each stage must take the same amount of time.
>
Yes: the period where a species is under uplift may vary a lot, but
it's said somewhere that the mean [median?] is 100k. And the
period of indenture is explicitly stated as 100k.

>
> My mental model is
> pre-uplift (stage 0)
> -> uplifting clients, this includes indenture (stages 1-5)
>
Ok, but why do you join the indenture period with the uplift
period? They are quite distinct phases.

> The pre-uplift stage goes fast but has high "mortality" as the GUI denies
> claims or proposed projects.  It is also irrelevant.  We do not worry about
> pre-clients in this "census".
>
Yes :-)

> The mean term for uplift/indenture combined is 100KY
>
No!!! The uplift process can be long or short, but the indenture period
is fixed.

> We approximate the rate of uplift as an average of 1.1 client per mature
> species. (The [fictional] real rate has to include non-reproducers and
> mortality and some growth in the number of citizen species it must be
> between 1.01 and 1.2.)  Clients are not fairly distributed.
>
> Lets assume 11% of all O-2 citizens are minors. (1% of these are going to
> get 'lost')
>
> Note this seems to imply that the mean life expectancy for an O-2 citizen
> race is about 1,000,000 years.  
>
This 1 My is explicitly stated in Heaven's Reach.

> This is a bit short for purposes of
> continuity with the fiction.  If you want the mean life expectency between
> the start of uplift and passing-on to be 10MY then you need to divide by
> 10, so only 1.1% of all O-2 citizens would be minors.
>
But 10 My is too much for an average. Notice that everybody expects the
Buyur to be retired, after "only" 0.5 My.

> With maximally equitble distribution about 10% of Citizens are patrons, 1%
> of the population have 2 clients.  In this sort of society you might want
> to uplift your client early to maximize your power.  This implies a species
> lifecycle of 10% minority, 10% young adult, 10% active parent with client,
> 70% empty nest (except for the 10% of the population who get a second
> client).    With low death rates the average client in its
> minority/indenture would have 4 ancestors in its patronymic because a
> citizen tends to start its uplift project when it is about 200KY old.
>
And this is consistent with the data from the Books.

> Alternatively, a most responsible citizen might uplift their client late so
> they have a lot of wisdom and technology for the project.  Then you have
> 10% minor, 60% adult, 10% parent, 20% elder.  Patronymics tend to be short.
>
And Patronymics _are_ short: few races enumerate more than 3 or 4 "daddies".

> At really low levels of equity only 1% of all species might be patrons at
> any given time and many patrons will be active uplifting clients throughout
> their careers as main sequence citizens.
>
> If we want 1MY mean life-spans, then 11% clients and 5% patrons might
> provide for interesting but not grossly inequitble politics consistent with
> existing sources on the Uplift Universe.
>
Uh?

Alberto Monteiro

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to