OK, first analysis of income by 20% grouping and top 5%.

                RR + GB^2        Clinton
1st 20%       7.6%              15.9%
2nd 20%      8.9%              15.5%
3rd 20%     11.2%              14.6%
4th 20%     14.0%              15.8%
5th 20%     24.8%               28.8%
top 5%       40.7%              43.4%


The numbers don't exactly match with the GDP numbers for a couple of
reasons.

There was approximately 2%-3% greater growth in the numbers of households
under RR + GB^2 than under Clinton.

The share of the GDP growth that went to household income was greater under
Clinton.

But, we see that, while richer households did approximately as well under 8
cherry picked years from the last 14 under Bush^2 & RR as under Clinton,
they bottom 40% only did half as well, and the middle 20% did about 20%
worse.



Dan M.


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to