> From: Damon Agretto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Whatever. > > Then make a well structured, reasonable post, without > using it as an ipportunity to launch attacks against > whomever you have an agenda against, and explain your > position in a form that does not involve posting > random articles that seem to support your agenda.
I've explained these things before. I'm not going to do so again, just because _you_ weren't reading. > > When they came for my freedom from arbitrary search > > and seizure I said > > nothing because I was not a drug dealer. > > > > When they came for the right of habeus corpus I said > > nothing because I > > was not a muslim. > > > > When they came for the right to silence I said > > nothing because I was not > > a criminal suspect. > > > > Now they've come for my freedom of speech and I > > can't say anything. > > Wonderful. I've heard this before. Care to add NEW > content? Further, this is only legitimate if you > believe that there is a conspiracy involved. Prove > there is a conspiracy beyond a shadow of a doubt, and > support it with verifiable evidence. In short, > CONSRUCT AN ARGUMENT. All of these right have been attacked by this administration, and I've posted multiple articles about the administrations attacks against every one of these rights. I'm not going to do it again, right here and now. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
