> Travis Edmunds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >From: Deborah Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<snip> > >So *I* propose that "All insults of a personal > nature > >must be just that - personal. Furthermore, primary > >insult words of less than 3 syllables are > >disqualified, unless they reflect the theme of the > >particular insult. Themes can be built around the > >insulter or insultee's hobbies, sports, or > profession, etc.." > > > >Example: Last week somebody trolled big-time; while > I ignored it on-line (as did 'most everyone, except > >for a few noting "troll!"), I *thought* "What a > remarkable case of cranio-rectal dystocia!" ;} > > > >The possibilities are endless... > >Debbi > >I'll See Your Parallel Prance, And Raise You A Kick > >Threat Maru U U ;) > I have a favor to ask Deborah. Could you please give > me an overview in a > nutshell of that post? I'm not following all the way > or something, and I > don't want to jump to conclusions. So if you could > indeed explain that a > little more clearly, I would greatly appreciate it. "Humor -- it is a difficult concept." 'The best defense against flame warring is excessive silliness' -- or something to that effect. <serious> You do realize that I was agreeing with your statement WRT 'some people just may be ignoring this as childish?' The sig incorporated my 2nd career, horses, as I requested. Debbi Is That Clearer? Maru :) __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
