From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Terrorists Win in Spain Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:48:17 -0500
At 04:20 PM 3/18/2004 +0100 John Doe wrote:
>So, John, >200k civilian deaths is "little to no evidence" for you? Then how
>many civilians should have been killed before you accept that ethnic
>cleansing happened? Couple of millions?
Just for the record, I said that there was "little to no evidence" of genocide. In fact, I used precisely the words "ethnic cleansing" to describe what was going on.
I am stunned. Over 200,000 *civilians* were killed in that conflict, and you still consider that "little to no evidence" of genocide? How many civilians would have to been killed before you call it genocide?
Would you call it genocide if those 200k+ civilians had been Americans rather than Yugoslavians?
BTW, your exact words were "little to no evidence of serious genocide". Are you implying that there is any other (not or not-so serious) form of genocide?
JD
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail en Messenger on the move http://www.msn.nl/communicatie/smsdiensten/hotmailsmsv2/
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
