<<http://www.trivalleyherald.com/Stories/0,1413,86~10669~2100333,00.html>>


...

Diebold Election Services Inc. president Bob Urosevichadmitted this and
more, and apologized "for any embarrassment." 

"We were caught. We apologize for that," Urosevich said of the mass
failures of devices needed to call up digital ballots. Poll-workers in
Alameda and San Diego counties hadn't been trained on ways around their
failure, and San Diego County chose not to supply polls with backup paper
ballots, crippling the largest rollout of e-voting in the nation on March
2. Unknown thousands of voters were turned away at the polls. 

"We're sorry for the inconvenience of the voters," Urosevich said. 

"Weren't they actually disenfranchised?" asked Tony Miller, chief counsel
to the state's elections division. 

After a moment, Urosevich agreed: "Yes, sir." 

Flanked by most of California's local elections officials and advocates
for the blind and speakers of minority-language, Diebold executives and
attorneys pleaded for one more chance. 

...

State elections officials were dismayed to find that Diebold had sold and
installed thousands of its new TSx machines in the state without getting
them tested, nationally qualified and even before applying for state
certification. 

"I understand your frustration," said Diebold chief developer Tab
Iredell. "Why did we sell something that we didn't think we could run?
Our understanding based on past experience was we thought we could get
that certified."



----
"If voting could really change things, it would be illegal." - Diebold
Internal Memos

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to