----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Warren Ockrassa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: Fascist Censorship Spreads: Vichy Style


> On Aug 25, 2004, at 2:16 PM, Dan Minette wrote:
>
> >
> >> In situations like this it might make more sense to give some
> >> enforcement power to an international authority comprised of member
> >> nations from all over the world. Of course the US has decided the UN
> >> is
> >> bogus, so until we get a little national humility and get rid of a
> >> certain arrogant, cowboy Texan in DC, little will change.
> >
> > But there is an experimental basis for that view of the UN.  For
> > example,
> > the UN is tacitly endorsing the genocide in the Sudan.  My Zambian
> > daughter
> > said that, as much as she hates to admit it, Bush has done more than
> > anyone
> > to address the situation.
>
> Yes, those kinds of lapses are really troubling and hard to understand.

Why are they hard to understand?  Arabs are committing genocide.  Europeans
want to be on the good side of Arabs.  Who cares about black Africans?

> It's not a perfect institution, but at the moment the entire planet is
> verging on slipping into balkanization -- a globe covered with nations
> engaged in petty squabbles for local and short-lived ascendancy.

And how in the world would the UN address that.  Remember the UN is an
organization of governments, and its first priority is best interest of
those governments.  Thus, human rights are simply paid lip service, and
used as a political tool.


>We (as  a planet or as a species) are not capable of sustaining or
surviving
> perpetual international war, and as imperfect as the UN is, it's what
> we've got right now to try to address these kinds of problems.

Actually, we have a lot of other ways to adress that.  The UN is a useful
tool to enforce the collective will of what were the most powerful
countries in the world.  When the enlightened self interest of the US,
China, Russia, France, and Britian align, the UN is a very useful tool.
When they don't, it doesn't do anything.

The General Assembly is even worse, ignoring real genocide and focusing on
attacking un-PC ethnic groups.

> The solution is not to unilaterally bomb the Enemy Of The Month.

While I agree that Iraq was a mistake, because the US wasn't prepared to
deal with the peace afterwards, that's really not a fair description of US
foreign policy over the last 15 years.  Let's look at a better
intervention, in the Balkins.  The UN specifically ordered its troops to
step aside and allow genocide.  The US violated international law by acting
and stopping genocide.  Its true that NATO finally went along with the US,
but that's because the mess was in Europe...and they were totally unable to
handle it.  Are you arguing that Clinton was morally oblidged to accept the
UN's ruling that the genocide must continue?

>The  solution *might be* to mobilize the will of nations to conform to the
> UN charter and to give it enough enforcement power to make its edicts
> carry some clout.

But, the will of the nations is not to do the right thing.  Its to preserve
the self interest of the governments.  The US has a tremendous self
interest in peace and stability.  A world in which poor dictatorships
become fairly well off liberal democracies (e.g. S. Korea, or Tawain) is in
the enlightened self interest of the US.  The US will keep its status as
the lone superpower for years in such a world.  France's self interest is
not the same.

Dan M.

This also means that nations (including the US) which
> step out of line need to accept sanction rather than charge off on
> their own.


> It's a damned mess, all of it. I've toyed from time to time with
> formally renouncing my specieshood as h. sapiens and declaring myself a
> bottlenosed dolphin instead. But they won't let me into any of their
> club meetings!

Actually, its an opportunity to make hard moral choices.  Bottlenosed
dolphins do neither good nor evil; making no moral choices.

Dan M.


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to