--- Warren Ockrassa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still feel (so far) that, all things being equal
> or equivalent 
> (population, power, etc) at the beginning of a
> contest, if you have two 
> evenly-matched nations, one of which is totalitarian
> and the other more 
> liberty-oriented, the totalitarian system will
> ultimately, eventually 
> collapse. I don't believe totalitarian systems are
> flexible, innovative 
> or robust enough to survive that kind of
> competition.

This is an argument first made my Machiavelli in his
Discourses on Livy.  Tocqueville also suggested in
_Democracy in America_, although, oddly enough, he
didn't apply it to the US.  In both cases, though,
they believed that this was something that could
happen only after a democracy had a long time to
develop.  They thought that democracies when they
first developed would be very vulnerable - far more so
than equivalent dictatorships.  Certainly political
scientists have noticed that democracies tend to win
the wars they fight more often than should be expected
(although they usually credit this fact to
democracies' superior ability to mobilize national
resources during a crisis).  All things being equal,
this may be true.  

The point Dan and I are making, though, is that
historically, things usually aren't equal.  There are
lots of highly plausible scenarios you can spin where
the most powerful country in the world is a fascist
dictatorship (Nazi Germany), a totalitarian Communist
dictatorship (the USSR), or any number of other
options.  For example, had the North lost the Civil
War, it's arguable that democratic reform in England
would have been far less successful - certainly,
that's what Gladstone thought, and he ought to have
known.  If any of these things had happened, we
wouldn't even know about this hypothetical advantage
democracies have.  The argument that "good"
governments win their wars is based on events that
could very easily have gone other ways, suggesting
that such an advantage, if it exists, is so small that
it's hardly sufficient to use to justify the
superiority of liberal governments.

=====
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com


                
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now. 
http://messenger.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to