On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 08:15:20PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote: > Arguing the tautology that anything that is not experimentally > testable is meaningless because it is not experimentally testable is > not really proving anything.
Arguing the tautology that arguing the tautology that anything that is not experimentally testable is meaningless because it is not experimentally testable is not really proving anything is not really proving anything. -- Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
