On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:22:41AM -0700, Dave Land wrote: > That was the purpose of the question, Eric.
No. > What is not as clear is the purpose of your riposte. It's purpose was to encourage you to re-read and think, Davey. Brin-L obviously has nothing to do with gambling. So Dan's statement was obviously rhetorical. Look for similarities between the unreasoning in Dan's statement and the one that started this thread. -- Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
