* Dan Minette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

> It may be helpful to look at the fraction of SS tax going to paying
> for the present generation (both retirement and disability) and for
> future use.  By decade the % of SS taxes being put away for the future
> is:

I don't think it is so helpful. The most clear way to see how SS is
on an unsustainable path of borrowing more and more from each future
generation is to look at SS (OASI and DI) receipts and outlays as a
percentage of GDP.

I got the data from OMB and CBO. It combines actual historical data with
CBO projections.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2004/hist.html
http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=3650&sequence=0

In order to make it easier to see what people are paying in and getting
out, I've shifted the receipts 30 years relative to the outlays (if
people pay in for 40 years and receive benefits for 20 years, then the
duration between the center of the 40 year period and the 20 year period
is 30 years)


                %GDP
 %GDP          Scheduled
Receipts        Outlays

             0.0   1940
             0.3   1950
             2.2   1960
1940   0.5   2.9   1970
1950   0.7   4.2   1980
1960   2.0   4.3   1990
1970   3.2   4.2   2000
1980   4.1   4.4   2010
1990   4.9   5.6   2020
2000   4.9   6.6   2030
2010   5.1   6.7   2040
2020   5.1   6.7   2050
2030   5.1   6.8   2060
2040   5.0   6.9   2070
2050   4.9   6.7   2080
2060   4.8
2070   4.8
2080   4.9

Note that this above are the scheduled outlays, i.e., the implicit
promises SS makes to pay, assuming no changes in the law. Note that
for every decade of receipts from 1940 to 2050, the outlays 30 years
later than the receipts constitute a larger fraction of GDP. People
are getting back more than they are paying in, at least if scheduled
benefits are paid.

However, SS trustees project that after 2042, if no changes are made,
we will only be able to pay 73% of scheduled benefits. Below is the new
table taking this into account.


                 Projected
Receipts          Outlays

             0.0   1940
             0.3   1950
             2.2   1960
1940   0.5   2.9   1970
1950   0.7   4.2   1980
1960   2.0   4.3   1990
1970   3.2   4.2   2000
1980   4.1   4.4   2010
1990   4.9   5.6   2020
2000   4.9   6.6   2030
2010   5.1   6.7   2040
2020   5.1   4.9*  2050
2030   5.1   5.0*  2060
2040   5.0   5.0*  2070
2050   4.9   4.9*  2080
2060   4.8
2070   4.8
2080   4.9

             * assuming 73% of scheduled


So you see, every year of receipts from 1940 until 2010, the outlays 30
years later exceed the receipts. Free lunch, if you believe in that sort
of thing. But starting for receipts in 2020 corresponding to outlays in
2050, the outlays are less than or equal to the receipts.

I'd be fine with that, actually. The boomers make out like bandits, but
I'm resigned to that. You can't fight the AARP and win.

However, judging from past history, the most likely outcome, if no
changes are made, is that around 2040 the boomer's children will start
lobbying for benefits that they were "promised", instead a 27% cut from
scheduled benefits. And the politicians will be glad to oblige. Just
raise taxes again to pay the AARP members. The AARP'ers get their money,
the politicians get re-elected, and everyone is happy. Until the next
generation (or the one after that) tries the same trick and the system
finally cracks under the strain (possibly helped along by Medicare)....




_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to