* Dave Land ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

> Actually, I thought it was pretty clear that Nick was objecting to what 
> he perceived as the Beeb's framing the story in the point of view of 
> the (literalist Christian) religious types who were reportedly 
> objecting to the films in question. The argument that "the Bible 
> contradicts science" is just a point of view. Moreover, it is a point 

A point of view held for most of the church's history, and still there
seem to be doctrinal arguments about it. I'd say it is YOUR revisionist,
apologist view for the church's numerous distortions that is a more
serious problem.

--
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to