Julia Thompson wrote: > Robert Seeberger wrote: >> Julia Thompson wrote: >> >>> 2) I'm wondering how much Gautam knows about Jim Wallis' ideas to >>> call them "bad". I think a debate on the merits and demerits of >>> Wallis's ideas would be interesting and would edify me without my >>> having to darken the doors of Barnes & Noble, or add to the giant >>> sucking sound coming from amazon.com, aimed at my bank account. >>> :) >>> (They don't have any of his stuff at the Half Price Books in Round >>> Rock today.) Nick and Dave have been going on as if Jim Wallis >>> was >>> the closest thing they've seen to the Messiah so far this year >>> (OK, >>> maybe that's an exaggeration), and I've heard negative opinions of >>> him from others. I'd love to see a reasoned, civil discussion on >>> the >>> question. Will I get my wish? >>> Julia >> >> >> And you have been on Brin-L how long? >> >> >> xponent >> Invoking Sturgeons Law Maru >> rob > > And the corollary would be that 10% of everything isn't crap. At > least in the original version. > > I can always hope, can't I? :) > > Julia > I was thinking much the same thing before I went to http://www.nice-tits.org/
Was I wrong for that? <G> xponent Libido'R'Us Maru rob _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
