> > From: "Nick Arnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 13:18:35 -0700 (PDT), Gautam
> > Mukunda wrote
> > >
> > > > Note that Dan
> > > > and I, for example, despite different
> positions
> > on the
> > > > war, have consistently acknowledged that going
> > to war
> > > > has costs.  What's striking is the asymmetry
> > here
> > > > because, of course, _not_ going to war has
> costs
> > as
> > > > well, and the reason this discussion isn't
> going
> > very
> > > > far is the failure to acknowledge that simple
> > fact.
> > >
> > > Good grief, Gautam.
> > >
> > > I've held the remaining hand of a double amputee
> > from Iraq and could
> > hardly
> > > speak as we looked into each other's eyes and I
> > told him about Wes.  
> 
<snipping>  
 
 I'm not exactly clear how I was supposed to respond
 to
 your post unless I, personally, had died in Iraq. 
 It
 was so emotional and yet irrelevant to the
 discussion.

 None of us have said that you don't care about
 American soldiers - although you've done your best
 in
 posts like this to imply that you do far more than
 people who disagree with you.  The point of this
 discussion isn't caring about Americans (even though
 that's the most important thing for me), it's caring
 about _Iraqis_.

 You mention being a first responder.  Let me see if
 an
 analogy in that context gets through.  When
 firefighters go into houses, some of them may die. 
 If
 they go into enough houses, some of them _will_ die.
 
 So a house is on fire and people inside it are
 burning
 to death.  We can hear them screaming.  You are
 saying
 - don't send firefighters into that house, some of
 them will die.  Dan and I are saying - okay, that
 might be a reasonable position, because some fires
 are
 just too dangerous to send people in.  But when you
 make that decision, isn't it important to take into
 account the people in the house?  And you're saying,
 no, we should send the firefighters in, because we
 don't want firefighters to die.  Other fires have
 gone
 out because we asked them to - we didn't have to
 send
 firefighters in.  To which we reply, okay, but those
 fires have nothing in common with this fire, so that
 doesn't have anything to do with whether
 firefighters
 should go into _this_ fire.  So you say - no
 firefighters should only go in when their _own_
 house
 is on fire.  To which we say, look, what if an
 entire
 apartment building was on fire?  To which your
 response is that's absurd, but you won't explain why
 your criteria would allow us to send firefighters
 into
 that apartment building.  So I say, look, all I'm
 saying is that the lives of people _inside the
 building_ are also a factor.  To which your response
 is, look, I'm really angry, I know firefighters and
 you couldn't possibly 
 
 Now, do you understand why some people might say -
 protecting the lives of firefighters is important. 
 We
 all want to do that.  It's really a little offensive
 that you imply that I don't want to do that.  But I
 don't want a fire marshall to make decisions based
 solely upon the fact that fighting fires risks
 firefighters.  It's also important to save the
 people
 in the buildings.
 
 We've talked about prayer a lot in this discussion -
 I
 am praying that this analogy is sufficiently clear
 that I don't have to spell out each particular
 parallel.
 
 So yes, I acknowledge that you've spoken to lots of
 soldiers have suffered.  Have you spoken to Iraqis
 who, say, saw their children raped and tortured in
 front of them as a routine method of interrogation? 
 How about ones whose hands, ears, or tongues were
 chopped off for opposing the regime?  All of these
 are
 things that would be happening _right now_ if the
 war
 had not happened.  They're also powerful and
 emotional.  Why don't they matter?  If they do, why
 shouldn't that at least be part of the calculation
 when we decide what to do?
 
 Gautam Mukunda
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 "Freedom is not free"
 http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com

Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to