In a message dated 8/17/2005 1:09:19 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > I don't know and I don't really understand Bob's viewpoint - I wish he'd > clarify. PNAC and the neoconservative movement look to me to be the > foundation of the current administration so when I hear the term Neocon, I > think of the President. I don't even recall hearing the term until either > shortly before the 2000 election or even afterwards. I am speaking a bit off the cuff but I believe that the neocon was statred by William Kristol (don't know if this is his first name) and Norman Poderatz. They were writers for I believe the "Nation" but I could be wrong on the details. I am aware of this because their "defection" from the liberalmovement was big news (well ok little news) and got some press in the the New York Times. I still don't think that Bush and Channey are neocons. I think they wanted to go after Sadaam and used the Neocon argruements. > > > >In conclusion; while neo-con has been used as a much broader > >category....the accusation that we are referring had its origin at a time > >when the Jewishness of the neo-cons was part of the perceived problem. > > It did? When was the accusation dated? What makes Sheehan's words (if > indeed she said what you have quoted) specifically reference the > historical Neocon movement and not the present administration? > > Can I also ask what the source of the quote you posted was? > > -- > _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
