On May 5, 2006, at 2:01 PM, Max Battcher wrote:
Dave Land wrote:
And, of course, each is a spectrum:
Because they are spectra there are a number of encoding schemes out
there to try to disambiguate those that move or are near the lines,
and some psychologists will tell you the categorizations are
meaningless without the full test and knowledge specific choices
within it. (...and others will tell you taking the test is only
every valid once or not at all or only on full moons.)
For instance, I sometimes find it useful to use xNTP, because I'm
pretty firm as far as the NTP side of the spectrum in every test
I've taken and generally in my judgment of the system itself says.
The I/E I tend to flip-flop depending on several factors. Another
choice would be to use something like I?NTP, as the I is often more
dominant, but again, subject to change.
Sure. I've taken to writing (on those rare occasions that it needs to
be written -- I'm not a type-freak) ENfP, because I am only weakly on
the "F" end of that particular spectrum.
As the Fool points out in his inimitable style, this stuff is not
mathematics. If it's science at all, it's a very fluffy kind of
science. Human behavior and the motivations behind it are notoriously
difficult to quantify, frustrating most attempts to do so.
Dave "Romans 7:15-15" Land
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
