On 5/6/06, Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nick wrote: > I see a glaring logical error. The idea that *only* science can minimize > self-deception and identify non-existent causes cannot be falsified. I don't get it, couldn't you falsify the idea by comming up with some other method that minimizes self-deception and identifies non-existent causes?
No, because the "other method" wouldn't be scientific, by definition. That's what happens when one argues from one's conclusions. Nick -- Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Messages: 408-904-7198 _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
