On 30 Jul 2006, at 1:31AM, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 30/07/2006, at 9:38 AM, jdiebremse wrote:
Of course, I don't think that Brother John does anyone any favors
when he equates ova and sperm with zygotes and unborn children.
No, he equated sperm and zygotes with "babies". Babies are infants
in the minds of most people. Not unborn children. He may have meant
it, but it's not what he said. It's that sort of rhetoric that
makes it impossible to have a debate with so many. Talking about
babies and children (rather than specifying unborn children or
foetuses) puts anyone on the other side in exactly the same
position that asking them "When did you stop beating your wife?"
does - there is no response that doesn't make them look defensive
or bad.
A little historical comparison of child mortality and birth
complication death rates of mothers in the past with now in developed
and other countries would be interesting.
But then, I see that "Brother John" is happily trolling in a couple
of subthreads now...
'Brother John' is a troll and probably someone who's been here before
yanking some chains.
Ding Dong Maru
--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/
Theists cannot be trusted as they believe that right and wrong are
the arbitrary proclamations of invisible demons.
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
