William T Goodall wrote:

On 30 Jul 2006, at 1:31AM, Charlie Bell wrote:


On 30/07/2006, at 9:38 AM, jdiebremse wrote:
Of course, I don't think that Brother John does anyone any favors
when he equates ova and sperm with zygotes and unborn children.

No, he equated sperm and zygotes with "babies". Babies are infants in the minds of most people. Not unborn children. He may have meant it, but it's not what he said. It's that sort of rhetoric that makes it impossible to have a debate with so many. Talking about babies and children (rather than specifying unborn children or foetuses) puts anyone on the other side in exactly the same position that asking them "When did you stop beating your wife?" does - there is no response that doesn't make them look defensive or bad.

A little historical comparison of child mortality and birth complication death rates of mothers in the past with now in developed and other countries would be interesting.


But then, I see that "Brother John" is happily trolling in a couple of subthreads now...

'Brother John' is a troll and probably someone who's been here before yanking some chains.
I am not a troll, and I have never been here before. I discovered this list while doing Google searches to find Mailman lists. Since I really like the SF of Gregory Benford and David Brin, I thought there might be some interesting people here. So far, I have not been disappointed. If I seem to be trolling, it is only because I have highly unusual opinions about many things. All my life I have been trying to figure out what the "truth" is by being the contrarian. I reason that if the "truth" exists, it must be very different from what most people think it is. If most people knew the "truth," whatever that is, the world wouldn't be a messed up as it is. While I cannot think of any better way for men to govern themselves than by the principle of majority rule, I have often pondered on how outrageously wrong the majority have often been in the past. Therefore, long ago I concluded that whatever the truth is, it must be a rare and precious commodity known to only a few people. And while I do not claim to know very much about truth, I have very little confidence in the knowledge of anyone else. They are as likely to be ignorant as I am, and in a few cases even more likely. My Uncle Bob used to say that "It isn't what you don't know that kills you, but what you know that's not so." I have often thought that must be true. A person who thinks he knows the truth when he actually doesn't is not very likely to figure out what it is. --JWR


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to