>I just disagree with Alberto's statement that ecology is for rich people. >Bangladesh is one of the poorest nations in the >world and is most vulnerable >to rising sea >levels. Do you think that they’ll be shouting "Jobs, not dry >land?"
In a sense ecology is for the rich; it is up to the rich who use a vastly disproportionate amount of the worlds resources and who have the technologic skill to do something about the environment to do it. This is not charity it is self-preservation for the haves as well as the have nots. A major economic and environmentatl upheaval will create chaos. It will scramble the deck. Those on top are unlikely to be on top afterwards not because they are inherently corrupt but because being on top is luck in the first place and you tend not to get lucky too many times in a row. ________________________________________________________________________ Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
