I've got to head out for a lesson, but will respond at
least partially-

> jdiebremse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Anyhow, by now the pattern of Diamond's narrative is
> becoming
> clear.   Prehistoric human civilization flourishes. 
>  Over time,
> prehistoric human civilization overpopulates and
> degrades its
> environment causing it to retreat from its former
> glory.

Actually, he said that was his initial premise, but he
realized that things were much more complex than just
environmental problems.  He lists 5 factors (which
somebody posted earlier, but I'll repeat here:
-damage people inflict on their environment
-climate change outside human influence
-hostile neighbors
-loss of supporting or helpful neighbors
-response of the society to problems

I think he subsets under that last that the society
must first perceive their problems in order to respond
to them.  [in the Prologue]
 
> As I noted earlier, my first objection to this
> Chapter is his use of
> the term "Anasazi" for the people of Chaco Canyon.  
> "Anasazi" is
> believed to have its origins in a Navajo word for
> "ancient enemy..."
<snip>

True, yet most Americans have an inkling of what
Anasazi means, while Ancient Puebloan will leave many
scratching their heads; parentheses might have been
useful to educate readers.  <wry>  I shall add that
'Navajo' is also a tacked-onto-the-people label, as
they call themselves Dineh', and their homeland
Dineh'tah.

> Now while Diamond does in fact point out that
> modern-day Puebloans
> are indeed descendants of the people of Chaco Canyon
> and Mesa Verde,
> I can't help but feel that he brushes over that
> fact.   After all,
> if the Chaco Canyon people continue to thrive to
> this day, then they
> don't make a very good type-example of "collapse"!

On page 155, he states "It took many centuries to
discover that, among those economies [Mimbres, Chaco,
Mesa Verde, Hohokam, Mongollon, etc.], only the Pueblo
economy was sustainable "in the long run," i.e. for at
least a thousand years."  He pointed out that while
deforestation was a problem for the Anasazi/APs, it
was not for the Hohokam, who didn't use wooden beams
for their houses.  So I don't think he ignores their
descent from the APs.

More in future, must go now!

Debbi
who is suspender-bustin' proud of her instructor's
praise for Cezanne's progress   :D

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to