--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Charlie Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Charlie Bell <charlie@> wrote: > >> The former of your definitions has only recently been added to > >> marriage law in Australia. The latter, well why not? *shrug* > >> Provided > >> people make provision for the children of such unions (adopted, > >> fostered or biological), what business is it of anyone else. > > > > > > Despite your cavalier attitude - "shrug" - you are, nevertheless, > > talking about a dramatic reordering of our basic societal > > structure. > > What? How? It doesn't change my marriage if my mate and his ? > partner's > relationship is recognised too.
You were just advocating marriages between three or more people.... JDG _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
