JDG wrote: > >> What? How? It doesn't change my marriage if my mate and his ? >> partner's >> relationship is recognised too. > > You were just advocating marriages between three or more people.... > What's wrong with that? Historically, marriage _was_ between three or more people. OTOH, the problems with the total or partial dissolution of such marriages would be heaven for lawyers.
I think that any "civil union" that gets established should not discriminate it to fscking pairs. What if an old man decides to "civil union" with his old sister? Or if a brother-sister pair decides to "civil union" with the brother's girlfriend? Alberto Monteiro _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
